Here. I’m not really sure who listens to small college sports radio, but apparently someone does.
I’ve never heard the word “dasn’t” before, but Mrs. O’Connor says its a word here:
The word “dasn’t” – also spelled “dassn’t” or “dassent” – is a regionalism, found mostly in the Northeast. It’s a contraction for “dare not,” “dares not,” or “dared not.”
Jay Nordlinger has a little language in his column too:
Let’s have a little language. A reader at a state justice department writes,
Could you give a ruling on the use of pled or pleaded as the past tense of plead? I’ve always liked and used pled, but many are telling me it’s just slang and wrong to use in formal court briefs. Where do you stand on this galvanizing issue?
Oh, my goodness, this is an easy one: Pled and pleaded are perfectly good words, perfectly good past tenses. They are equally right. Say pled with confidence, even zeal, and tell your false correctors to . . . I don’t know: do something unpleasant.
Another reader writes, “When I worked for a cable-TV company, a young Texan complained to the chief engineer that while he was watching a movie the picture ‘just blunk off.’ Funny, yes?” Great.
Another reader: “Something I’ve oft wondered about: louse/lice; mouse/mice. And why aren’t neighborhoods full of hice?” Hmmm . . .
A reader living in the Czech Republic writes,
I teach English, and I get interesting questions about the language all the time. A recent impromptu of yours reminded me of something. My girlfriend is German, and her English is excellent, but the first winter we were together she said something like, “It had snown, so we went sledding.” I laughed. She said, “Well, I learned English in San Antonio. We didn’t get much of a chance to conjugate that particular verb.”
Thanks for reminding me!
Sure! Finally, a friend of mine coined a word: profaganda, meaning left-wing indoctrination instilled by professors.
Writing about economics isn’t easy, but Gordon Chang has a highly understandable piece in the Weekly Standard here on what would happen if – as some chicken littles are screaming – China stopped buying all our debt.
The theory goes that Pres. Obama is sending us into the land of huge debt (he is) and China at some point will stop buying that debt thus bringing us to our economic knees. Chang explains how it will actually bring China to it’s knees.
It’s a good example of the fact that you can’t control markets (for long) and you especially can’t control currency markets. Also, why is the dollar the foundation of world markets? It isn’t that our economy is huge. It isn’t that we exercise hegemony over the globe. It’s because we have a stable politic system (compared to the rest of the world). There’s no worries that we’ll become a Italy or Argentina with chronically wobbly governments that play around (too much) with our currency. We’re responsbile…which just goes to show how bad the rest of the world is.
There’s a shower at the Cincinnati Athletic Club that scares hell out of me.
It looks like it was built in the 1920s based on a 15th century Tomas De Torquemada design. It obviously doesn’t get along with the other showers because it’s segregated away from them. It has it’s own little piece of the basement facing the pool. It’s like a small closet enclosed in tile with a simple clear curtain forcing the bather to be exposed to anyone wishing to view the torment.
It’s water feds through at 2″ pipe rising from the floor. The only faucet is a valve about 3 feet above the floor that looks like it may require a boilermaker’s arm to turn on. The pipe continues upward and over the head of the bather. It splits into two. One split goes to a shower head that’s the size of a dinner dish at a Myrtle Beach all-you-can-eat seafood buffet. The other split leads to a network of pipes that wrap around the bather from about knee to shoulder height. Hinges would make it a passable iron maiden. The pipe feeds 6 smaller – and more forceful shower heads that I sure the Cincinnati Zoo used to bath the elephants before they decided it was too cruel. Each pipe has small holes – about 50 in total – that spray out like a water saw.
As the single valve indicates, there’s only one water temperature choice. That choice is cold. Throwing the valve down leads to 9 seconds of creaking while the water gurgles its way through the apparatus. When it finally does come, the force is stunning, but you brave against it. “It’s not too cold,” you think to yourself, but about 30 seconds in the truly cold water kicks in. Your manhood is shamed. Not only your life – but your grandfather’s life flashes before your eyes. The force and volume of the water is so immense that the four inch drain can’t handle it so after 45 seconds your up past your ankles in arctic H2O.
Finally, you can’t take anymore. You grasp for the valve. It doesn’t give at first but with the force of both hands and your knees it gives.
On days approaching 100 degrees, the cool stays with you for hours. Very Nice.
On of the things I learned when I started writing for various publication is “journalistic ethics”. I committed a couple of faux paus (not that anyone held it against me). But I realized they had some of the same silly (and over-thought rules) that other industries have (including my day job).
A couple of stories reminded me that the small fish play by the rules while the bigger fish play by their own rules.
The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank has a write up of Pres. Obama and the planted question. I didn’t see the presser, but by Milbank’s description, it seemed pretty obvious the questioner was a plant. Is obvious plant less harmful? I think so, but then again “the whole world is watching” including much of the world without a free press.
A story that really angers me yet didn’t get so much attention is the rescue of NY Times Reporter David Rohde from the Taliban. The New York Times (and other media sources) hushed it up to protect Rohde. Good for them. I just wished they used the same restraint when they endangered are American military personnel such as their disclosure of NSA wiretaps and Treasury Department money tracking. Good posts on this here and here.
I sometimes question whether some business writers ever took an economics class, that’s why I’m always willing to speak on background to anyone with questions.
The recent talk of Fed actions is a case in point. This BusinessWeek piece about today’s Fed is almost incomprehensible to the average readers. This WSJ journal piece is better written and offers a good history lesson.
For a more in-depth lesson on the debate among policy makers regarding monetary policy, I’ve not found anything better than this old piece from NRO. The events are dated but the lessons timeless.
Here. As I tweeted, I now have three degrees of seperation from JFK. The artist trained under an artist who did the official White House portrait.
A simple metaphor for “stimulus” spending is that it’s like steering an enormous cruise ship. It doesn’t turn the economy on a dime. You have to steer it (spend) well before you want to turn (before a recession). Gov’t spending takes 9-12 months to get through the system to generate economic activity (not that it’s good activity).
That’s what makes this Forbes.com headline good: “Leading economic indicators up more than expected”. The public, politicians and policy makers don’t realize we’re in a recession until we’re well into it. Usually by the time they act, the economy corrects itself. It’s happening again: none of the recent “stimulus” has hit yet, but we’re already in the turn away from recession.
Now when the stimulus does hit, it will be like we’re oversteering…which will require an equal oversteer in the opposite direction….which may require another jerk of the wheel.
That’s why it’s best to leave things alone. It’s hard because the public is yelling for “experts” to “do something” but the first priority for policymakers is to get Hippocratic and “do no harm”.